Als unabhängiger Think Tank erarbeitet der Verein Ethik und Medizin Schweiz VEMS im Auftrag der Stiftung für Fairness im Gesundheitswesen Analysen und Lösungsansätze für das Gesundheitswesen.
Der VEMS ….
Lesen Sie unseren Newsletter VEMSInsights, unser FairfondPeek oder lesen Sie unseren aktuellen Jahresbericht.
Übersetzen Sie unsere Website in jede beliebige Sprache mit Rechtsclick und Google Übersetzer. Keine Gewähr für die Übersetzungen. Es gilt die deutsche Sprache
We are currently working on the key topic of “Physician Profiling” and “Risk equalisation”
Follow us on linked in
Follow “ambulante Versorgung“
12.03.2025: New Statistical Guide for Lawyers (german version, reviewed and approved by lawyers)
12.03.2025: Why risk equalisation does not work to profile patients, doctors and insurers
Presentation of the problems (deutsche Version) / Statistische Selbstverteidigung
Have the profiling methods (ANOVA index and REGRESSIONS index) been sufficiently validated, and if not, what are the likely implications?
An adjustment method based on pharmaceutical cost groups (PCG) is used in the cost-efficiency procedures. Are these sufficiently validated?
Planned interactive online training and discussion on the topic “WZW 2024: Arguments for a reset?” with input presentation and participation of all important stakeholders (FOPH, FMH, health economists, lawyers, health insurers) with the following questions:
“What is the legal risk of profilers when they use wrong instruments?
“To what extent could it be assumed a priori that the profiling methods meet the “realiability” requirements?”
“Which published profiling instruments have been sufficiently validated for which specialist group?”
“Where is there a need for improvement in profiling?”