Willkommen

Als unabhängiger Think Tank erarbeitet der Verein Ethik und Medizin Schweiz VEMS im Auftrag der Stiftung für Fairness im Gesundheitswesen Analysen und Lösungsansätze für das Gesundheitswesen.

Der VEMS:

recherchiert,

kalkuliert,

kommuniziert,

interagiert.

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter VEMSInsights oder lesen Sie unseren aktuellen Jahresbericht.


We are currently working on the key topic of “Physician Profiling” and “Risk equalisation”

Have the profiling methods (ANOVA index and REGRESSIONS index) been sufficiently validated, and if not, what are the likely implications?
An adjustment method based on pharmaceutical cost groups (PCG) is used in the cost-efficiency procedures. Are these sufficiently validated?
Planned interactive online training and discussion on the topic “WZW 2024: Arguments for a reset?” with input presentation and participation of all important stakeholders (FOPH, FMH, health economists, lawyers, health insurers) with the following questions:

“What is the legal risk of profilers when they use wrong instruments?
“To what extent could it be assumed a priori that the profiling methods meet the “realiability” requirements?”
“Which published profiling instruments have been sufficiently validated for which specialist group?”
“Where is there a need for improvement in profiling?”

  1. Presentation of the problems (deutsche Version) / Statistische Selbstverteidigung
  2. https://docfind.ch/RSAReport2024.pdf
  3. Associated text document 2 (PCG)
  4. https://docfind.ch/VEMSBerichtPCG.pdf
  5. https://docfind.ch/PCG_theory.pdf
  6. What happend so far.xlsx
  7. Profiling risk for insurers